And to fill all these white pages that are left for me with the same monotonous question: at what hour do the hours end? And the anterooms, the memorials, the intrigues, the negotiations with the Janitor, the Rotating Chairman, the Secretary, the Associate, the Delegate. To glimpse the Influential from afar and to send my card each year to remind – who? – that in some corner, devoted, steady, plodding, although not very sure of my existence, I too await the coming of my hour, I too exist. No. I quit.
Yes, I know, I could settle down in an idea, in a custom, in an obsession. Or stretch out on the coals of a pain or some hope and wait there, not making much noise. Of course it's not so bad: I eat, drink, sleep, make love, observe the marked holidays and go to the beach in summer. People like me and I like them. I take my condition lightly: sickness, insomnia, nightmares, social gatherings, the idea of death, the little worm that burrows into the heart or the liver (the little worm that leaves its eggs in the brain and at night pierces the deepest sleep), the future at the expense of today – the today that never comes on time, that always loses its bets. No. I renounce my ration card, my I.D., my birth certificate, voter's registration, passport, code number, countersign, credentials, safe conduct pass, insignia, tattoo, brand.
The world stretches out before me, the vast world of the big, the little, and the medium. Universe of kings and presidents and jailors, of mandarins and pariahs and liberators and liberated, of judges and witnesses and the condemned: stars of the first, second, third and nth magnitudes, planets, comets, bodies errant and eccentric or routine and domesticated by the laws of gravity, the subtle laws of falling, all keeping step, all turning slowly or rapidly around a void. Where they claim the central sun lies, the solar being, the hot beam made out of every human gaze, there is nothing but a hole and less than a hole: the eye of a dead fish, the giddy cavity of the eye that falls into itself and looks at itself without seeing. There is nothing with which to fill the hollow center of the whirlwind. The springs are smashed, the foundations collapsed, the visible or invisible bonds that joined one star to another, one body to another, one man to another, are nothing but a tangle of wires and thorns, a jungle of claws and teeth that twist us and chew us and spit us out and chew us again. No one hangs himself by the rope of a physical law. The equations fall tirelessly into themselves.
And in regard to the present matter, if the present matters: I do not belong to the masters. I don't wash my hands of it, but I am not a judge, nor a witness for the prosecution, nor an executioner. I do not torture, interrogate, or suffer interrogation. I do not loudly plead for leniency, nor wish to save myself or anyone else. And for all that I don't do and for all that they do to us, I neither ask forgiveness nor forgive. Their piety is as abject as their justice. Am I innocent? I'm guilty. Am I guilty? I'm innocent. (I'm innocent when I'm guilty, guilty when I'm innocent. I'm guilty when ... but that is another song. Another song? It's all the same song.) Guilty innocent, innocent guilty, the fact is I quit.
I remember my loves, my conversation, my friendships. I remember it all, see it all, see them all. With melancholy, but without nostalgia. And above all, without hope. I know that it is immortal, and that, if we are anything, we are the hope of something. For me, expectation has spent itself. I quit the nevertheless, the even, the in spite of everything, the moratoriums, the excuses and forgiving. I know the mechanism of the trap of morality and the drowsiness of certain words. I have lost faith in all those constructions of stone, ideas, ciphers. I quit. I no longer defend this broken tower. And, in silence, I await the event.
A light breeze, slightly chilly, will start to blow. The newspapers will talk of a cold wave. The people will shrug their shoulders and continue life as always. The first deaths will barely swell the daily count, and no one in the statistics bureau will notice that extra zero. But after a while everyone will begin to look at each other and ask: what's happening? Because for months doors and windows are going to rattle, furniture and trees will creak. For years there will be a shivering in the bones and a chattering of teeth, chills and goose bumps. For years the chimneys, prophets, and chiefs will howl. The mist that hangs over stagnant ponds will drift into the city. And at noon beneath the equivocal sun, the breeze will drag the smell of dry blood from a slaughterhouse abandoned even by flies.
No use going out or staying at home. No use erecting walls against the impalpable. A mouth will extinguish all the fires, a doubt will root up all the decisions. It will be everywhere without being anywhere. It will blur all the. mirrors. Penetrating walls and convictions, vestments and well-tempered souls, it will install itself in the marrow of everyone. Whistling between body and body, crouching between soul and soul. And all the wounds will open because, with expert and delicate, although somewhat cold, hands, it will irritate sores and pimples, will burst pustules and swellings and dig into the old, badly healed wounds. Oh fountain of blood, forever inexhaustible! Life will be a knife, a gray and agile and cutting and exact and arbitrary blade that falls and slashes and divides. To crack, to claw, to quarter, the verbs that move with giant steps against us!
It is not the sword that shines in the confusion of what will be. It is not the saber, but fear and the whip. I speak of what is already among us. Everywhere there are trembling and whispers, insinuations and murmurs. Everywhere the light wind blows, the breeze that provokes the immense Whiplash each time it unwinds in the air. Already many carry the purple insignia in their flesh. The light wind rises from the meadows of the past, and hurries closer to our time.
Even with our most trusted friends we feel reluctant to talk about complex meanings or complex kinds of responses because we feel our language is not adequate ..(concept, terminology..etc) Perhaps education gives us a language to articulate what we know and experience but we cannot adequately communicate. If we are determined though we will acquire this language...A "film language", drawback though, film language "any" language in fact, does "our thinking for us".
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search This Blog
Archives
-
►
2014
(1)
- ► January 2014 (1)
-
►
2010
(8)
- ► October 2010 (1)
- ► February 2010 (6)
-
►
2008
(53)
- ► April 2008 (11)
- ► March 2008 (6)
- ► February 2008 (33)
- ► January 2008 (2)
-
▼
2007
(235)
- ► December 2007 (34)
- ► November 2007 (18)
-
▼
October 2007
(183)
- Food and Mood
- Alfred Hitchcock Scene from The Birds
- like a rolling stone
- Psycho
- Hitchcock The Birds
- Alfred Hitchcock The Birds trailer
- Alfred Hitchcock Presents - Cure for insomnia
- Alfred Hitchcock interview 60s
- Alfred Hitchcock Part 2
- Alfred Hitchcock interview 1964 (part 1)
- Alfred Hitchcock Montage 1
- Alfred Hitchcock Short Interview Excerpts
- Talk with Hitchcock
- Alfred Hitchcock Cameos
- gobraingo
- Art Learn Art
- Doris Lessing - Bio - Books - Analysis
- Cacoyannis - Euripides: Elektra (1962-Irene Pappas...
- Cacoyannis - Euripides: Elektra (1962-Irene Pappas...
- Cacoyannis - Euripides: Elektra (1962-Irene Pappas...
- ELEKTRA (SOPHOCLES 410 BC)
- Hiro at the Maritime
- No title
- Theodorakis - (1977) Axion Esti 1977 - Part 1
- Theodorakis - Concert (1977) Ena to Xelidoni
- Theodorakis - Concert (1977)
- Brigitte Bardot in Le Mépris
- Jean-Luc Godard -Le Mépris
- A Tribute To Jean Seberg
- Jean Seberg (2)
- JEAN SEBERG
- Jean-Luc Godard - A bout de souffle
- Jean-Pierre Melville - Le Doulos - 1962
- SEFERIS (Against the Dictatorship 1969)
- Γιώργος Χειμωνάς - Ο Βοηθός των Θαμμένων
- Nίκος Γκάτσος - Αμοργός
- Γιάν Χένρικ Σβαν
- Για να αλλάξεις κάτι..
- At New York Film Festival
- Miklós Jancso: The Red and The White
- Angelopoulos - Le Regard D'Ullysse
- Farantouri (Vintage)
- thought process - drawing
- Picasso ( a study ) (b)
- The Mystery of Picasso
- Picasso ( a study)
- Pablo Picasso
- Bunuel - Viridiana
- Luis Bunuel
- Bunuel -Tristana , Catherine Deneuve
- Buñuel - Los Olvidados [alternate ending] (1950)
- Bunuel - Tribute
- Bunuel = belle de jour
- Bunuel - Belle de Jour
- Luis Bunuel ''L'Age d'or'' (b)
- Luis Bunuel : ''L'age d'or'' (a)
- Monica Vitti, Jeanne Moreau
- Manitas de Plata with Brigitte Bardot - Soirée Fla...
- Brigitte Bardot - L'appareil a sous
- Brigitte Bardot & Serge Gainsbourg - Bonnie & Clyde
- Serge Gainsbourg & Brigitte Bardot
- Trufaut :Jules et Jim Race
- Truffaut : Jeanne Moreau - Le Tourbillon (Jules et...
- Antonioni: Goodbye Michelangelo 31/07/2007
- Antonioni - Funeral Service for Michelangelo
- Antonioni - Il Deserto Rosso (b)
- Antonioni - Il Deserto Rosso
- Antonioni - L'eclisse (b)
- Antonioni - L'eclisse
- Guitar
- Bergman speaks about Antonioni
- Antionioni - Passenger
- Antonioni - Blow Up
- L'avventura (1960) - Michelangelo Antonioni
- Antonioni - Zabriskie Point
- Fellini - Amarcord (dinner scene)
- Fellini - Amacord
- Fellini - 8 1/2
- J. M. Coetzee - The Nobel Prize in Literature 2003
- José Saramago - The Nobel Prize in Literature 1998
- Gabriel García Márquez - The Nobel Prize in Litera...
- Jean-Paul Sartre - The Nobel Prize in Literature 1964
- Kenzaburo Oe - The Nobel Prize in Literature 1994
- Albert Camus - The Nobel Prize in Literature 1957
- Pablo Neruda (pen-name of Neftalí Ricardo Reyes Ba...
- Octavio Paz - The Clerk's Vision
- Octavio Paz - The Nobel Prize in Literature 1990
- Octavio Paz - Banquet Speech
- Octavio Paz - Motion
- Robert Bresson - Paul Schrader on Pickpocket - 2
- Robert Bresson - Paul Schrader on Pickpocket - 1
- Robert Bresson - Pickpocket
- Andrei Tarkovsky interview part 1
- Andrei Tarkovsky interview part 2
- Andrei Tarkovsky : A tribute
- Tarkovsky on Art Part 2
- Tarkovsky - The Sacrifice
- Andrei Tarkovsky - Nostalghia (1983)
- Tarkovsky and Bresson in Cannes (1983)
- Tarkovsky on Art Part One
The discourse of "Film Culture" requires us to conceive of cinema in its own terms.
The discourse of film research will lead us to particular descriptions, " limited" kinds of analysis determined by the categories cinema provides.
Discourse is a complex concept. It refers to the way in which something is told not just in terms of its specific language (whether verbal or visual) but also in terms of what it prioritizes. Discourses are both general and specific. Narrative "realist" cinema is a discursive form, a particular kind of human expression which represents the world in a certain way, employs a particular kind of a time-visual "language". Within narrative "realist" cinema as a whole, particular genres have their own more specific discourses. i.e. The Sci-Fi film is preoccupied with themata (idea-themes) of science and control. the romance is preoccupied with themata of sexuality, gender and often property relations. These ideas are either implicit -taken for granted within the way the story is conceived or explicit - in that the film actively promoted certain values, attitudes and beliefs.
The concept of Discourse is closely connected with another key concept HEGEMONY "taken-for-granted" a "common sense" outlook on some aspect of human reality shared by the vast majority of people within the society. Hegemony helps us to understand the illusion that commonly shared attitudes and values, ways of making sense of our world, appear to come from nowhere. Narrative "realist" cinema has this characteristic, it disguises its discursiveness by pretending to be simply "there". Discourses about law and order and sexuality, for example - are themselves seen as non-discursive, as natural, as taken for granted. These core values of society appear to come from nowhere- they simply are ! This leads to a compounding of a criticism leveled against popular cinema (and other popular media) that not only does it disguise its own discursive form, but it also "naturalizes" these profoundly significant social and political discourses. THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT THEIR "CONSTRUCTED" REALITY AND THE VALUE SYSTEMS THAT FUNDAMENTALLY INFLUENCE OUR LIVES. “being indoctrinated with a political spin.” From a commercial perspective, however, the very opposite may appear to be the case. People do not want to think critically about their "constructed" reality. They pay for their entertainment, so they can be released from the concerns of their lives. They may well want the security of hegemonic values within familiar discourses. The point is that it has less to do with questions of an active/passive audience. It has to do either with the choices we make or the level of (a)Competence - (b)Education and (c) CineNoesis we bring to cinema and the screening events we attend
The discourse of film research will lead us to particular descriptions, " limited" kinds of analysis determined by the categories cinema provides.
Discourse is a complex concept. It refers to the way in which something is told not just in terms of its specific language (whether verbal or visual) but also in terms of what it prioritizes. Discourses are both general and specific. Narrative "realist" cinema is a discursive form, a particular kind of human expression which represents the world in a certain way, employs a particular kind of a time-visual "language". Within narrative "realist" cinema as a whole, particular genres have their own more specific discourses. i.e. The Sci-Fi film is preoccupied with themata (idea-themes) of science and control. the romance is preoccupied with themata of sexuality, gender and often property relations. These ideas are either implicit -taken for granted within the way the story is conceived or explicit - in that the film actively promoted certain values, attitudes and beliefs.
The concept of Discourse is closely connected with another key concept HEGEMONY "taken-for-granted" a "common sense" outlook on some aspect of human reality shared by the vast majority of people within the society. Hegemony helps us to understand the illusion that commonly shared attitudes and values, ways of making sense of our world, appear to come from nowhere. Narrative "realist" cinema has this characteristic, it disguises its discursiveness by pretending to be simply "there". Discourses about law and order and sexuality, for example - are themselves seen as non-discursive, as natural, as taken for granted. These core values of society appear to come from nowhere- they simply are ! This leads to a compounding of a criticism leveled against popular cinema (and other popular media) that not only does it disguise its own discursive form, but it also "naturalizes" these profoundly significant social and political discourses. THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT THEIR "CONSTRUCTED" REALITY AND THE VALUE SYSTEMS THAT FUNDAMENTALLY INFLUENCE OUR LIVES. “being indoctrinated with a political spin.” From a commercial perspective, however, the very opposite may appear to be the case. People do not want to think critically about their "constructed" reality. They pay for their entertainment, so they can be released from the concerns of their lives. They may well want the security of hegemonic values within familiar discourses. The point is that it has less to do with questions of an active/passive audience. It has to do either with the choices we make or the level of (a)Competence - (b)Education and (c) CineNoesis we bring to cinema and the screening events we attend
No comments:
Post a Comment