Friday, October 12, 2007

Για να αλλάξεις κάτι..

Για να αλλάξεις κάτι, πρέπει να κάνεις χαμαλοδουλειά
Για το «Χρυσό Σημειωματάριο»: «Ήταν μια προσπάθεια να σπάσουν κάποιες φόρμες συνείδησης και να προχωρήσουμε πέρα απ΄ αυτές».
Προς την Τζόις Κάρολ Όουτς: «Νομίζω πως ξεκινάς να αλλάξεις την κοινωνία με τη λογοτεχνία και έπειτα, όταν δεν συμβαίνει τίποτα, έχεις μια αίσθηση αποτυχίας. Έπειτα όμως αναρωτιέσαι:
γιατί αισθάνθηκα ότι θα αλλάξω την κοινωνία; Κι έτσι συνεχίζεις».
«Τα περισσότερα μυθιστορήματα φάνηκε ότι δεν είχαν τη δύναμη να αλλάξουν τον κόσμο. Μπορεί όμως κανείς να πει ότι ο Σολζενίτσιν συνέβαλε στην κατάρρευση της Σοβιετικής Ένωσης».
«Ο φεμινισμός δεν στράφηκε εκεί που θα τον ήθελα να έχει στραφεί. Οι φεμινίστριες του ΄60 ήταν απασχολημένες με το να χοροπηδάνε σε διάφορες σκηνές και βήματα. Αλλά για να αλλάξεις κάτι, πρέπει να κάνεις χαμαλοδουλειά». «Υπάρχει μια ψυχοπαθολογία. Όλα αυτά που πιστεύαμε, με την πτώση του καπιταλισμού, ότι το μέλλον θα είχε δικαιοσύνη, ισότητα, ίσες αμοιβές για τις γυναίκες, τους ανάπηρους, τους μαύρους, ήταν αηδίες. Δεν είχαν καμία σχέση μ΄ αυτό που συνέβαινε στον κόσμο. Και όμως, έφεραν μια τεράστια συναισθηματική φόρτιση. Και αν σε συνεπάρει η γνήσια πίστη, μπορούν να συμβούν θαυμάσια πράγματα»

No comments:

Search This Blog

Archives

The discourse of "Film Culture" requires us to conceive of cinema in its own terms.

The discourse of film research will lead us to particular descriptions, " limited" kinds of analysis determined by the categories cinema provides.

Discourse is a complex concept. It refers to the way in which something is told not just in terms of its specific language (whether verbal or visual) but also in terms of what it prioritizes. Discourses are both general and specific. Narrative "realist" cinema is a discursive form, a particular kind of human expression which represents the world in a certain way, employs a particular kind of a time-visual "language". Within narrative "realist" cinema as a whole, particular genres have their own more specific discourses. i.e. The Sci-Fi film is preoccupied with themata (idea-themes) of science and control. the romance is preoccupied with themata of sexuality, gender and often property relations. These ideas are either implicit -taken for granted within the way the story is conceived or explicit - in that the film actively promoted certain values, attitudes and beliefs.

The concept of Discourse is closely connected with another key concept HEGEMONY "taken-for-granted" a "common sense" outlook on some aspect of human reality shared by the vast majority of people within the society. Hegemony helps us to understand the illusion that commonly shared attitudes and values, ways of making sense of our world, appear to come from nowhere. Narrative "realist" cinema has this characteristic, it disguises its discursiveness by pretending to be simply "there". Discourses about law and order and sexuality, for example - are themselves seen as non-discursive, as natural, as taken for granted. These core values of society appear to come from nowhere- they simply are ! This leads to a compounding of a criticism leveled against popular cinema (and other popular media) that not only does it disguise its own discursive form, but it also "naturalizes" these profoundly significant social and political discourses. THINK CRITICALLY ABOUT THEIR "CONSTRUCTED" REALITY AND THE VALUE SYSTEMS THAT FUNDAMENTALLY INFLUENCE OUR LIVES. “being indoctrinated with a political spin.” From a commercial perspective, however, the very opposite may appear to be the case. People do not want to think critically about their "constructed" reality. They pay for their entertainment, so they can be released from the concerns of their lives. They may well want the security of hegemonic values within familiar discourses. The point is that it has less to do with questions of an active/passive audience. It has to do either with the choices we make or the level of (a)Competence - (b)Education and (c) CineNoesis we bring to cinema and the screening events we attend